Transformation or cultural change means a qualitative change. Any change may face many difficulties; problems of cultural conflict and anti-progress currents will become apparent even as the changes occur.
Religious activists have been able to discuss their own perceptions and the frameworks of their belief through contact with the spirituality of the people. They use this to appeal to their congregation’s emotions.
Despite the increasing stream of tolerance and the emergence of religious moderation we are finding, we have to admit that the extremists have not come from nowhere. Their rhetoric has engulfed the idea of tolerance and has continuously contributed to the bankruptcy of the literature of coexistence and dialogue of civilization for decades. Their ideas are cemented as typically “traditional” in social thought. This means that the community cannot find an alternative to the construction of their identities.
There is no perfect society free of the differences within. The challenge is how to organize and manage those differences in ways that help integrate them into the public identity of the community. Then social diversity can be a cause for celebration — turning conflict into harmony, with a focus on commonalities to dissolve differences and give value to new ideas and space for the consideration of all people. Today we have a fertile ground for the ideas of the enlightenment that takes all the spectra in the community into account. However, we will remain paralyzed unless the people are enabled and activated to influence and change things. This value will make everyone feel a responsibility in the new construction, rather than be treated by culture and consciousness as outsiders.
In less than five years, we will see the difference in industry and in the development of the cultural landscape. We should ensure that growth in many directions does not contradict each other so as not to hinder the achievement of our goals. We must enable the cultural discourse, enable the impact that it has, and minimize any negative effects.
We need to ensure the protection of cultural institutions, their support for our role and their integration in the society and its institutions. In order for this to occur, it is necessary to reform the speech of mosques, and to call for a national co-existence under the umbrella of tolerance and religion. It is necessary to look at life from the aspects of the most beautiful. Through this, we can awaken individuals from their slumber to look forward to knowing and awareness, and then introduces them to others to change the society for the better.
Religious activists have been able to discuss their own perceptions and the frameworks of their belief through contact with the spirituality of the people. They use this to appeal to their congregation’s emotions.
Despite the increasing stream of tolerance and the emergence of religious moderation we are finding, we have to admit that the extremists have not come from nowhere. Their rhetoric has engulfed the idea of tolerance and has continuously contributed to the bankruptcy of the literature of coexistence and dialogue of civilization for decades. Their ideas are cemented as typically “traditional” in social thought. This means that the community cannot find an alternative to the construction of their identities.
There is no perfect society free of the differences within. The challenge is how to organize and manage those differences in ways that help integrate them into the public identity of the community. Then social diversity can be a cause for celebration — turning conflict into harmony, with a focus on commonalities to dissolve differences and give value to new ideas and space for the consideration of all people. Today we have a fertile ground for the ideas of the enlightenment that takes all the spectra in the community into account. However, we will remain paralyzed unless the people are enabled and activated to influence and change things. This value will make everyone feel a responsibility in the new construction, rather than be treated by culture and consciousness as outsiders.
In less than five years, we will see the difference in industry and in the development of the cultural landscape. We should ensure that growth in many directions does not contradict each other so as not to hinder the achievement of our goals. We must enable the cultural discourse, enable the impact that it has, and minimize any negative effects.
We need to ensure the protection of cultural institutions, their support for our role and their integration in the society and its institutions. In order for this to occur, it is necessary to reform the speech of mosques, and to call for a national co-existence under the umbrella of tolerance and religion. It is necessary to look at life from the aspects of the most beautiful. Through this, we can awaken individuals from their slumber to look forward to knowing and awareness, and then introduces them to others to change the society for the better.
