Russian meddling casts ‘dark shadow’ over MH17 trial: prosecutors

Russian meddling casts ‘dark shadow’ over MH17 trial: prosecutors
1 / 2
Prosecutors Thijs Berger, Ward Ferdinandusse and Dedy Woei-a-Tsoi attend the criminal trial against four suspects in the July 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, in Badhoevedorp, Netherlands. (REUTERS)
Russian meddling casts ‘dark shadow’ over MH17 trial: prosecutors
2 / 2
Anton Kotte, who lost his son, daughter-in-law and grandson in the MH17 crash, waits outside the court for the start of the second day of the trial. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 10 March 2020

Russian meddling casts ‘dark shadow’ over MH17 trial: prosecutors

Russian meddling casts ‘dark shadow’ over MH17 trial: prosecutors
  • 298 people were killed when the Malaysian Airlines jet was shot down by a Russian-made missile over war-torn eastern Ukraine
  • Some witnesses have chosen to remain anonymous to protect themselves from Russian security services

BADHOEVEDORP: Dutch prosecutors accused Russia on Tuesday of interfering with the probe into the downing of flight MH17 and casting a “dark shadow” over the trial of four suspects in the disaster.
Moscow had tried to track down witnesses in the trial that started on Monday in the Netherlands, leaving some in fear for their lives in case they were identified, prosecutors said.
Three Russians and a Ukrainian are on trial over the 2014 crash of the Malaysia Airlines jet in rebel-held eastern Ukraine with the loss of all 298 people on board, 196 of them Dutch.
“There are clear indications that Russian security services are actively attempting to disrupt efforts to establish the truth behind the shooting down of flight MH17,” prosecutor Thijs Berger told judges.
Russian spies had also tried to hack Malaysian and Dutch authorities investigating the crash, he said.
“Seen as a whole, this information casts a dark shadow over these proceedings,” Berger said.
The trial opened in the absence of the suspects — Russian nationals Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov and Ukrainian citizen Leonid Kharchenko. Pulatov is the only one represented by a lawyer and he denies all involvement.
International investigators say the Boeing 777 was hit by a Russian-made BUK surface-to-air missile, fired from territory held by pro-Moscow rebels battling Kiev.

Relatives of those who died have repeatedly called for the trial to examine the role of Russia in the crash.
“The court has made it crystal clear that the Russian government is staging a campaign of disinformation,” Anton Kotte, a board member of a foundation for MH17 victims, said Tuesday.
“And we will have to be prepared for much more distortion of the truth as the case proceeds.” Kotte lost his son, daughter-in-law and grandson.
Moscow has repeatedly denied any involvement in the crash of MH17, or in eastern Ukraine generally.
Pulatov’s defense lawyer rejected the prosecutor’s “sharp” comments, saying the remarks on witness safety were “not only premature, but highly public.”
“I wonder why the Dutch authorities at the same time when it suits them, ask for the cooperation of the Russian Federation,” lawyer Boudewijn van Eijck said.
Prosecutors have said Russia was trying to trace potential witnesses in the trial, some of whom will testify anonymously.
“The use of Russian security services to discover the identify of witnesses in this investigation is a very real scenario,” Berger added.
“Several witnesses in this investigation say that they fear for their lives if their identities were to come to light.”

The prosecutors added that Russian security services were already “accused of multiple murders that have been committed in various European countries.”
Special protection had been given to one witness, who was willing to be named later in the proceedings but was remaining anonymous for now given the security concerns, prosecutors said.
Only referred to as M58 at this stage, the witness was a Russian volunteer attached to a separatist unit close to the BUK when it was launched on the day MH17 was shot down.
The witness had testified that Russian military personnel — whom separatists said were from Russia’s FSB security agency — were with the missile at the launch site, they added.
“Once it became clear in the following hours that it was not a military aircraft but civilian flight, MH17, the disinformation campaign started immediately,” prosecutor Dedy Woei-a-Tsoi said.
Another witness identified only as S24 had “expressed a fear of reprisals by the Russian Federation.” And a third, known as V9, had asked to remain anonymous because “I might get picked up by Russian special services,” the prosecution added.
The case was adjourned for two weeks and will resume on 23 March.