International community’s feeble response to Israeli violence
An Israeli attack on Gaza was clearly imminent, but not because of any provocations by Palestinian groups in the besieged, impoverished Strip. The Israeli military escalation was foreseeable because it factors neatly into Israel’s contentious political scene. The attack was not a question of “if” but rather “when.”
The answer came on Tuesday, when the Israeli military launched a major strike against Gaza, killing Islamic Jihad commander Bahaa Abu Al-Ata, along with his wife Asma.
More strikes followed, targeting what the Israeli military described as Islamic Jihad installations. However, the identities of the victims, along with damning social media footage, pictures, and eyewitness accounts, indicate that civilians and civilian infrastructure were also bombed and destroyed.
As of Thursday, when a truce was announced, 32 Palestinians had been killed and more than 80 wounded in the Israeli aggression.
What truly frustrates any meaningful discussion on the horrific situation in Gaza is the feeble international response, whether by organizations with the sole objective of ensuring world peace or the mainstream Western media, which ceaselessly celebrates its own accuracy and impartiality.
A most disappointing response to the Israeli violence was offered by Nickolay Mladenov, the UN special coordinator for the Middle East peace process.
Mladenov, whose job should have long been deemed pointless considering that no “peace process” actually exists, expressed his “concern” about the “ongoing and serious escalation between Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Israel.”
Not only did Mladenov’s statement create a moral equivalence between an occupying power, which instigated the war in the first place, and a small group of a few hundred armed men, but it is also dishonest.
“The indiscriminate launching of rockets and mortars against population centers is absolutely unacceptable and must stop immediately,” Mladenov elaborated, putting great emphasis on the fact that “there can be no justification for any attacks against civilians.”
Shockingly, Mladenov was referring to Israeli, not Palestinian civilians. At the time that his statement was released to the media, there were already dozens of Palestinian civilians killed or wounded, while Israeli media reports spoke of a few Israelis who had been treated for “anxiety.”
The EU did not fare any better. It parroted the same US knee-jerk response by condemning “the barrage of rocket attacks reaching deep into Israel.”
“The firing of rockets on civilian populations is totally unacceptable and must immediately stop,” a statement by the European bloc read.
Is it possible that Mladenov and top EU foreign policymakers do not truly comprehend the political context of the latest Israeli onslaught — that embattled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using military escalation as a way of fortifying his weakening grip on power?
Considering this, what is one to make of the generally poor Western media coverage, the inept analyses and the absence of balanced reports?
In a report published by the BBC on Wednesday, the British broadcaster referred to “cross-border violence between Israel and militants in Gaza.”
But Gaza is not an independent country and, as per international law, it is still under Israeli occupation. Israel declared Gaza a “hostile territory” in September 2007, arbitrarily establishing a “border” between it and the besieged Palestinian territory. For some reason, the BBC finds this designation acceptable.
CNN, on the other hand, reported that “Israel’s military campaign against Islamic Jihad” was entering its second day, while emphasizing the UN condemnation of the rocket attacks.
CNN, like most of its American mainstream counterparts, reports on Israeli military campaigns as part and parcel of some imagined “war on terror.” Therefore, analyzing the language of US mainstream media with the purpose of underlining and emphasizing its failures and biases is a useless exercise.
Sadly, US bias regarding Palestine has also extended to the mainstream media in the European countries that were once, to some degree, fairer, if not exactly sympathetic, toward the Palestinians’ situation.
El Mundo of Spain, for example, mentioned a number of Palestinians — making sure to emphasize that they were “mostly militants” — who “died” as opposed to being “killed” by the Israeli military.
“The escalation followed the death of Gaza’s armed branch leader,” El Mundo reported, failing once more to pinpoint the culprits in these seemingly mysterious deaths.
La Repubblica, which is perceived in Italy as a “leftist” outlet, sounded more like a rightwing Israeli newspaper in its description of the events that led to the deaths of many Palestinians. The Italian newspaper used a fabricated timeline that only exists in the mind of the Israeli military and decision-makers.
“Several rockets were launched toward Israel by Gaza’s Islamic Jihad, breaking the brief nightly truce, according to (rightwing Israeli newspaper) The Jerusalem Post and to the Israeli army,” it reported.
It is obvious that the West’s ‘newspapers of record’ have maintained their blind spot on fairly reporting on Gaza.
It remains unclear what “truce” La Repubblica was referring to.
France’s Le Monde followed suit, using the same deceptive and cliched Israeli lines. Interestingly, the deaths of many Palestinians in Gaza did not deserve a place on the French newspaper’s homepage. Instead, it chose to highlight a comparatively irrelevant news item, in which Israel denounced the labeling of illegal settlement products as “discriminatory.”
Maybe one could have excused these across-the-board journalistic and moral failings if it were not for the fact that the Gaza story has been one of the most-covered news topics anywhere in the world for more than a decade.
It is obvious that the West’s “newspapers of record” have maintained their blind spot on fairly reporting on Gaza. They have kept the truth from their readers for many years, most likely so as not to offend the sensibilities of the Israeli government and its powerful allies and lobbies.
While one cannot help but bemoan the decline of good journalism in the West, it is also important to acknowledge with much appreciation the courage and sacrifices made by Gaza’s young journalists and bloggers who, at times, are targeted and killed by the Israeli army for conveying the truth about the plight of the besieged but tenacious Strip.
- Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of Palestine Chronicle. His latest book is “The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story” (Pluto Press, London). Baroud has a Ph.D. in Palestine studies from the University of Exeter. Twitter: @RamzyBaroud