Generative AI will enhance human potential, not replace it, KPMG exec says

Generative AI will enhance human potential, not replace it, KPMG exec says
ChatGPT propelled generative AI into the spotlight giving rise to several other chatbots like Google’s Bard & Microsoft’s Bing. (Reuters/Sourced)
Short Url
Updated 15 June 2023
Follow

Generative AI will enhance human potential, not replace it, KPMG exec says

Generative AI will enhance human potential, not replace it, KPMG exec says
  • Traditionally, technology has ‘freed us to focus on more complex work,’ Fady Kassatly says
  • Kingdom aims to be global leader in field, seeks $20bn in investment by 2030

DUBAI: Earlier this year, advisory firm KPMG announced a new initiative to deploy a series of generative artificial intelligence investments and alliances to empower its workforce, offering new solutions for clients and redefining how it operates.

The company is not alone in doing so. Several others have adopted AI, particularly generative AI, both internally and externally. Deloitte, for example, launched its AI Institute in Riyadh last month, while in February, STEP Conference used ChatGPT to write copy for its outdoor adverts.

Simply put, generative AI is a subset of AI “that can produce new and original content,” Fady Kassatly, partner and head of digital and innovation at KPMG, told Arab News.

The content can include anything from text and images to music and even software code.

“While traditional AI focuses on categorizing or labeling existing data, generative AI pushes boundaries by producing new output,” Kassatly said.

ChatGPT, in particular, is what propelled generative AI into the spotlight for mass audiences giving rise to several other chatbots like Google’s Bard, Microsoft’s Bing and Snapchat’s My AI.

The generative AI hype went beyond ChatGPT, however, with the surge of other models like “GPT-4, PaLM2, Stable Diffusion and DALL-E, with applications like ChatGPT and Bard leveraging these models to achieve meaningful results,” Kassatly said.

Microsoft has already integrated its AI assistant feature Co-Pilot across GitHub, Office 365, Teams and Windows, and software company Salesforce has launched Einstein GPT, which it describes as the world’s first generative AI customer relationship management technology, delivering AI-created content across every sales, service, marketing, commerce and IT interaction.

“Generative AI in business applications could lead to transformative results, sparking innovation, efficiency and growth in the region,” Kassatly said.

This was particularly evident in the UAE, “where the National AI Strategy 2031 aims to accelerate the adoption of emerging AI technologies and attract and nurture talent to develop solutions to complex problems using AI,” he added.

Similarly, Saudi Arabia launched its National Strategy for Data and Artificial Intelligence in October 2020, aimed at making the Kingdom a global leader in the field as it seeks to attract $20 billion in foreign and local investments by 2030.

The Kingdom also aims to transform its workforce by training and developing a pool of 20,000 AI and data specialists.

“Governments in the region have recognized the potential of these emerging technologies and are taking active steps to incorporate them into their economies and societies,” said Patrick Patterson, CEO of Level Agency.

“For example, the UAE, which is projected to gain the most from AI — accounting for close to 14 percent of its GDP by 2030 — has even appointed a minister of state for digital economy, AI and remote working systems to oversee this digital transformation,” he told Arab News.

As with any new technology, the growth of generative AI has raised concerns over its ability to replace humans.

“Looking at the history of transformative technologies like spreadsheets, graphical user interfaces, the internet and smartphones, we see a pattern where these technologies haven’t displaced humans but have instead made tasks more efficient, and freed us to focus on more complex work, leading to heightened productivity and innovation,” said Kassatly, who predicts a similar pattern with generative AI.

That said, the job market is likely to change in the future with new industries, businesses and jobs being created.

But this transformation would also lead to job losses, especially in the short term, in sectors like customer service, translation and interpretation, data entry and accounting, Patterson warned.

“In fact, as per some estimates, up to 45 percent of the current jobs in the Middle East could potentially be automated by 2030.

“(But) It is imperative to remember that every technological revolution, while displacing old jobs, also gives rise to new roles that we may not have even envisaged yet,” he said.

Patterson added that as AI systems became more prevalent, the job market would see a surge in demand for data scientists and other roles related to their development and maintenance, with the Middle East expected to “create approximately $366.6 billion in wage income from AI-related roles.”

Still, the growth of AI is not without risk.

“Bias is an inherent risk in AI systems since they learn from existing data. So if the training data contains biases, these biases can be reflected in the outputs generated by AI algorithms,” Kassatly said.

“Another pitfall is hallucinations, which occur when generative AI produces outputs that are entirely fabricated and lack factual or logical basis.”

In April, ChatGPT was found to be citing articles from The Guardian that never existed. The British paper was contacted separately by a student and a researcher asking for articles they had come across during their research using ChatGPT but could not find.

Kassatly said the reasons for this “are not yet fully understood, but advancements in tools and techniques are expected to reduce this occurrence over time.”

Another area of concern is data privacy.

“Ensuring enterprise-grade security and data privacy measures is essential when deploying generative AI systems,” he added.

“When using publicly available generative AI applications like ChatGPT or Bard for content creation, there is also a risk of generated text or images not complying with applicable IP or copyright laws and human intervention or supervision is necessary to navigate these pitfalls and ensure compliance.”

Lastly, like any powerful technology, generative AI was susceptible to intentional misuse, Kassatly said.

Phishing, a technique used by online hackers to acquire sensitive data such as passwords or banking information, has been a leading concern for chief information security officers in Saudi Arabia, with 30 percent identifying such attacks to be the most significant threat to their organizations, according to Proofpoint’s 2022 Voice of the CISO report.

The use of generative AI to craft “highly convincing phishing attacks” was a concern, Emile Abou Saleh, Proofpoint’s regional director for the Middle East and Africa, told Arab News.

“The rapid evolution of generative AI techniques poses a challenge for traditional security defenses, and the ability of AI models to generate realistic content and imitate trusted sources can undermine even the most robust security measures,” he added.

The rise of deepfakes, misinformation and misleading content was already a challenge, even before the popularity of generative AI.

Arthur Gregg Sulzberger, chairman of the New York Times, said during a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting earlier this year that ChatGPT would exacerbate the global problem of disinformation.

“A lot of this will not be information that is created with the intent to mislead, but based on everything I’ve read, I suspect we are going to see huge amounts of content that is produced, none of which is particularly verified (and) the origins of which are not particularly clear,” he said.

Microsoft President Brad Smith said in a speech in Washington last month on how best to regulate AI that his biggest concern around AI was deepfakes.

He called for steps to ensure that people knew when an image or video clip was real and when it was generated by AI.

Generative AI could help publishers by generating large volumes of content, enhancing user engagement through personalized experiences and streamlining operations with automation, Kassatly said.

But he, too, warned publishers of the concerns around “content authenticity and preserving journalistic integrity,” advising them to “ensure AI-generated content is clearly labeled to uphold journalistic standards.”


20-year-old comic book on Gaza rushing back to print

20-year-old comic book on Gaza rushing back to print
Updated 10 December 2023
Follow

20-year-old comic book on Gaza rushing back to print

20-year-old comic book on Gaza rushing back to print
  • Comic, written by Maltese-American journalist Joe Sacco, pioneered what was dubbed “comic journalism”

LONDON: A graphic novel looking into Gaza that was published in 2003 has rushed back into print after the conflict broke out between Israel and Hamas in October.

The comic, written by Maltese-American journalist Joe Sacco, pioneered what was dubbed “comic journalism” and tells the tales of his own work on the ground in the enclave in 1991.

It even drew praise from renowned Palestinian-American academic Edward Said, who said: “With the exception of one or two novelists and poets, no one has ever rendered this terrible state of affairs better than Joe Sacco.”

Since the outbreak of the conflict, the comic’s publisher said that demand for the novel soared.

Fantagraphics co-founder Gary Groth said: “We blew out of our inventory of several thousand copies quickly and are reprinting now. Retailers and wholesalers began ordering the book in far greater quantities than in the recent past, which indicates that every element down the chain — consumers and retailers — are expressing demand for it.”

Sacco, a cartoonist from Portland, told the UK’s Observer: “Things had seemed very bad when I was visiting in the early 1990s, at the end of the first intifada, but things were very much worse 10 years later.

“That the book itself still has relevance is a sorry testament to the enduring tragedy of the Palestinians — though, in some ways, it’s also a tribute to their fortitude, their unwillingness to give in.

“I would go back, if I could get in. Thankfully, many brave Palestinian journalists are doing exemplary work despite the appalling conditions and the very real danger to themselves and their families. But the main reason I would like to go back to Gaza is to see my friends there. I hope they will make it through this.”


Clip emerges of Israeli troops burning aid in Gaza

Footage has emerged on social media appearing to show IDF troops setting fire to humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip. Screenshot
Footage has emerged on social media appearing to show IDF troops setting fire to humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip. Screenshot
Updated 10 December 2023
Follow

Clip emerges of Israeli troops burning aid in Gaza

Footage has emerged on social media appearing to show IDF troops setting fire to humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip. Screenshot
  • In the footage, men in IDF uniforms smile as they set food and water in the back of a truck alight

LONDON: Footage has emerged on social media appearing to show Israel Defense Forces troops setting fire to humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip.

In the footage, shared by Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, men in IDF uniforms smile as they set food and water in the back of a truck alight.

The incident reportedly took place in the Shejaiya neighborhood of Gaza City, where IDF forces are engaged in fighting against suspected Hamas militants.

Muhammad Shehada, chief of communications at Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, said of the footage on X: “Note the immense satisfaction & smile from ear to ear on one of the soldiers’ faces! They were the ones to film & post this b/c there will be ZERO consequences to this depravity.”

Reporting on the footage, Gergana Katseva, a news reporter for Britain’s Metro newspaper, described it as “sickening.”


Social media users call for Zara boycott after ‘Gaza destruction-inspired’ ad campaign sparks uproar online

Social media users call for Zara boycott after ‘Gaza destruction-inspired’ ad campaign sparks uproar online
Updated 10 December 2023
Follow

Social media users call for Zara boycott after ‘Gaza destruction-inspired’ ad campaign sparks uproar online

Social media users call for Zara boycott after ‘Gaza destruction-inspired’ ad campaign sparks uproar online

LONDON: Spanish fashion retailer Zara is facing an online backlash for its latest advertising campaign, which social media users have criticized for its alleged similarities with destruction in Gaza.

The campaign, named “The Jacket” and part of the brand’s Atelier series, features model Kristen McMenamy carrying a mannequin covered in white cloth, while other mannequins appear with limbs missing. She is surrounded by rubble in the images.

Social media users are comparing the depiction with images of the bodies of those killed in the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

One eagle-eyed critic also alleged one of the pieces of plasterboard in the background of the images is shaped like a map of Palestine.

 

 

As the campaign images went viral over the weekend, many on social media were calling for people to boycott Zara. The firm has since deleted posts containing the images but is yet to issue a statement.

“Using death and destruction as a backdrop for fashion is beyond sinister, it’s complicity and should outrage us as consumers, boycott Zara,” Palestinian artist Hazem Harb wrote on Instagram.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Hazem Harb (@hazemharb)

 

Influencers Noor Amra and Hina Cheema also posted on Instagram, with the message: “We have all seen the devastating images of shrouded bodies coming out of Gaza ... It’s clearly a deliberate mock to Palestinians. They know exactly what they are doing.”

Responding to the post, the president of Huda Beauty, Mona Kattan, wrote: “Sick.”

Twitter user @AKoleWorld added: “My favorite brand until now. Whole closet was Zara. Sending to a homeless shelter and never buying again.”


Haaretz analysis reveals civilians account for 61% of Gazans killed by Israeli airstrikes

Haaretz analysis reveals civilians account for 61% of Gazans killed by Israeli airstrikes
Updated 09 December 2023
Follow

Haaretz analysis reveals civilians account for 61% of Gazans killed by Israeli airstrikes

Haaretz analysis reveals civilians account for 61% of Gazans killed by Israeli airstrikes
  • The Haaretz study corroborates an investigation conducted by two other Israeli news websites, suggesting Israel was deliberately targeting residential blocks

LONDON: Civilians in Gaza constituted a staggering 61 percent of the total death toll in the first three weeks of Israel’s assault on the Palestinian enclave, a study published on Saturday by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz found.

The Israeli military’s operation in Gaza, which began on Oct. 7 following a Hamas attack, killed more than 9,000 people, including at least 3,600 children, in the first three weeks alone.

As the offensive expands into southern Gaza, where civilians were previously ordered by the Israeli Defense Forces to relocate, the death toll has passed 21,731, including more than 8,697 children, according to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor.

The Haaretz analysis found that in three of Israel’s previous assaults on Gaza between 2012 and 2022, about 40 percent of the total deaths were civilians.  

The newspaper’s findings confirm an investigation conducted 10 days ago by two other Israeli news websites, +972 Magazine and Local Call, which concluded that Israel was deliberately targeting residential blocks.

These studies come as the US administration faces global criticism, as well as allegations of supporting war crimes, for vetoing a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch, said that the US “risks complicity in war crimes” by continuing to provide Israel with weapons and diplomatic cover.


Israel’s former justice minister walks out during RT interview

Israel’s former justice minister walks out during RT interview
Updated 09 December 2023
Follow

Israel’s former justice minister walks out during RT interview

Israel’s former justice minister walks out during RT interview
  • The host later asked Beilin about dubious evidence surrounding the events of Oct. 7 and evidence of Israeli friendly fire on the same day
  • Beilin became furious with the direction of the interview before deciding to walk away

DUBAI: Former Israeli Justice Minister Yossi Beilin walked out of a televised interview after being challenged by the presenter to respond to reports on the Israel-Hamas war.

During an interview with Russia Today presenter Afshin Rattansi, Beilin was asked about the mass slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza and the parallels between the Palestinian resistance and Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress resistance.

A heated exchange took place when the presenter challenged the ex-Israeli minister to respond to unverified accounts regarding the rape of Israeli women hostages captured by Hamas.

Beilin said: “I don’t want even to argue about it. If people don’t believe these poor women were hit and raped and whatever, I’m not in the situation to prove them that they are wrong.”

Rattansi said the claims had never been proven. 

The host later asked Beilin about dubious evidence surrounding the events of Oct. 7, as well as evidence of Israeli friendly fire on the same day, published in a report by Israeli newspaper Haaretz. 

He sarcastically responded, saying: “Maybe it is true, and all the 1,200 people who were killed on Oct. 7 were killed by Israelis … Are you crazy? … We killed ourselves and raped ourselves.”

The presenter replied that it was not a matter of believing whether this truly happened, but rather a matter of presenting evidence to verify or dispute such claims.   

As Beilin became furious with the direction of the interview, the presenter moved on to the topic of Israel’s support for Daesh fighters in Syria.

Beilin, however, refused to comment on the matter before abruptly ending the interview.