It was bacteria — not a miracle — on a communion wafer in US church

It was bacteria — not a miracle — on a communion wafer in US church
1 / 2
A view of St. Anthony of Padua Church, where a communion wafer with red marks was discovered, in Morris, Indiana. (WKRC-TV via AP)
It was bacteria — not a miracle — on a communion wafer in US church
2 / 2
An interior view of St. Anthony of Padua Church, where a communion wafer with red marks was discovered, in Morris, Indiana. (WKRC-TV via AP)
Short Url
Updated 27 March 2025
Follow

It was bacteria — not a miracle — on a communion wafer in US church

It was bacteria — not a miracle — on a communion wafer in US church
  • The host, or bread, with red marks had fallen out of a Mass kit at St. Anthony Church in Morris, Indiana
  • A biochemical analysis revealed only “fungus and three different species of bacteria, all of which are commonly found on human hands”

MORRIS, Indiana: A laboratory analysis turned up nothing miraculous about red marks found on a Communion wafer at a Catholic church in Indiana.
The discovery at St. Anthony of Padua Catholic Church in Morris was unusual enough for a formal inspection, the Archdiocese of Indianapolis said.
But a biochemical analysis revealed only “fungus and three different species of bacteria, all of which are commonly found on human hands,” the archdiocese said Monday, adding that no blood was found.




Samples of the Catholic sacramental bread. (Wikimedia Commons: Patnac)

The Catholic faith teaches that wine and a bread wafer signify the body and blood of Jesus Christ. Typically, they’re consecrated by a priest at Mass.
The host, or bread, with red marks had fallen out of a Mass kit at St. Anthony Church.
“Throughout the history of the Catholic Church, there have been well-documented miracles and apparitions, and each has been thoroughly and carefully reviewed,” the archdiocese said.
Before the analysis, some members of St. Anthony Church were excited about what might be found.
“We have such a little town. You can drive through and blink and you’re through it,” Shari Strassell, a church member, told WKRC-TV. “It means the world, it does, and I think there is something special about our church up here.”


Writer David Szalay wins prestigious Booker Prize for fiction with his earthy novel ‘Flesh’

Writer David Szalay wins prestigious Booker Prize for fiction with his earthy novel ‘Flesh’
Updated 11 November 2025
Follow

Writer David Szalay wins prestigious Booker Prize for fiction with his earthy novel ‘Flesh’

Writer David Szalay wins prestigious Booker Prize for fiction with his earthy novel ‘Flesh’
  • “Flesh” was praised by many critics but frustrated others with its refusal to fill in the gaps in István’s story

LONDON: Canadian-Hungarian-British writer David Szalay won the Booker Prize for fiction on Monday for “Flesh,” the story of one man’s life from working-class origins in Hungary to mega-wealth in Britain, in which what isn’t on the page is just as important as what is.
Szalay, 51, beat five other finalists, including favorites Andrew Miller of Britain and Indian author Kiran Desai, to take the coveted literary award, which brings a 50,000-pound  payday and a big boost to the winner’s sales and profile.
He was chosen from 153 submitted novels by a judging panel that included Irish writer Roddy Doyle and “Sex and the City” star Sarah Jessica Parker.
Doyle said “Flesh” — a book “about living, and the strangeness of living” — emerged as the judges’ unanimous choice after a five-hour meeting.
Szalay’s book recounts in spare, unadorned style the life of taciturn István, from a teenage relationship with an older woman through time as a struggling immigrant in Britain to unlikely denizen of London high society.
Szalay said he wrote “Flesh” under pressure, after abandoning a novel he’d been working on for four years.
He said the story grew from “simple, fundamental ingredients.” He knew he “wanted a book that was partly Hungarian and partly English” and was about “life as a physical experience.”
Accepting his trophy at London’s Old Billingsgate — a former fish market turned glitzy events venue — Szalay thanked the judges for rewarding his “risky” novel.
He recalled asking his editor “whether she could imagine a novel called ‘Flesh’ winning the Booker Prize.”
“You have your answer,” he said.
Doyle, who chaired the judges, said István belongs to a group overlooked in fiction: a working-class man. He said that since reading it, he looks more closely when he walks past bouncers standing in the doorways of Dublin pubs.
“I’m kind of giving him a second look, because I feel I might know him a bit better,” said Doyle, whose funny, poignant stories of working-class Dublin life won him the 1993 Booker Prize for “Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha.”
“It presents us with a certain type of man that invites us to look behind the face.”
Szalay, who was born in Montreal to a Hungarian father and Canadian mother, raised in the UK and now lives in Vienna, was previously a Booker finalist in 2016 for “All That Man Is,” a series of stories about nine wildly different men.
“Flesh” was praised by many critics but frustrated others with its refusal to fill in the gaps in István’s story – great swathes of life, including incarceration and wartime service in Iraq, occur off the page – and its stubbornly unexpressive central character, whose most common remark is “Okay.”
“He is quite an opaque character,” Szalay acknowledged at a news conference. “He doesn’t explain himself to the reader. He isn’t very articulate. So I really didn’t know quite how people would respond to him as a character.”
Doyle said the judges “loved the spareness of the writing.”
“We loved how so much was revealed without us being overly aware that it was being revealed. … Watching this man grow, age, and learning so much about him – despite him, in a way,” he said. “If the gaps were filled, it would be less of a book.”
Founded in 1969 and open to English-language novels from around the world, the Booker Prize has established a reputation for transforming writers’ careers. Winners have included Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan, Arundhati Roy, Margaret Atwood and Samantha Harvey, who took the 2024 prize for space station story “Orbital.”
Szalay said he hadn’t thought about what he will do with his prize money, beyond “going on a nice little holiday with a bit of it and put the rest in the bank.”
Last year’s winner Harvey, who handed Szalay the Booker Prize trophy, had some advice.
“Buckle up, and get a good accountant,” she said.