Israel describes BBC report on Gaza hospital attack as ‘modern blood libel’

The Israeli government claimed that the reporting had contributed to regional instability and the cancellation of a summit involving US President Joe Biden and leaders from Egypt and Palestine. (AFP/File)
The Israeli government claimed that the reporting had contributed to regional instability and the cancellation of a summit involving US President Joe Biden and leaders from Egypt and Palestine. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 October 2023
Follow

Israel describes BBC report on Gaza hospital attack as ‘modern blood libel’

Israel describes BBC report on Gaza hospital attack as ‘modern blood libel’
  • The Israeli government drew parallels between the report and a historical, antisemitic conspiracy theory that falsely accused Jews of using Christian blood in religious rituals
  • A reporter had said there was lack of clarity about the attack but speculated Israel might be responsible; a BBC spokesperson said ‘both sides’ competing claims’ had been set out

LONDON: The Israeli government has criticized the BBC for its coverage of the explosion at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza, describing it as a “modern blood libel.”

It came after a BBC reporter on Tuesday night suggested, shortly after the blast, that there was a lack of clarity but it might have been the result of an attack by Israeli forces, a claim the Israeli government vehemently denies.

In a message posted by its official account on social media platform X on Thursday, the Israeli government wrote: “Hey @BBCWorld, as of this morning your modern blood libel about the hospital attack is still up. We see you, and now everyone else does too.”

The reference to a “modern blood libel” was drawing a parallel between the reporting of the hospital explosion, which was led by correspondent Jon Donnison, and a historical, antisemitic conspiracy theory in which Jews were falsely accused of using Christian blood during religious rituals.

 

The attack on the hospital on Tuesday was the most deadly single incident since the conflict between Hamas and Israel began on Oct. 7. The exact death toll remains uncertain but hundreds of patients and civilians who had been advised to shelter in the hospital are believed to have been killed.

It is still unclear who was responsible for the attack, with each side in the conflict blaming the other, leading to speculation and heightened tensions among politicians and the public. Israeli officials said their investigations suggest a rocket fired from Gaza had fallen short of its intended target. Hamas said an Israeli missile caused the explosion.

In his report, Donnison said that “given the scale of the explosion” Israel might have been behind it, and “the Israeli military has been contacted for comment and they say they are investigating.” The Israeli government’s strong rhetoric in response to the reporting is not the only criticism the BBC has faced over it. Concerns were also raised by some in the UK.

During an appearance on BBC Radio 4’s Today program, British Security Minister Tom Tugendhat condemned the “irresponsible speculation” as “really serious,” and suggested it had not been “the BBC’s finest hour.”

In response, Nick Robinson, the presenter of Today and a former BBC political editor, said the BBC’s international editor, Jeremy Bowen, had publicly stated that “viewers of the 10 o'clock news and people across our footage were left in no doubt that there was no clarity about who’d carried it out.”

A BBC spokesperson similarly defended the broadcaster’s coverage, saying that “anyone watching, listening to or reading our coverage can see we have set out both sides’ competing claims about the explosion, clearly showing who is saying them and what we do or don’t know.”

The Israeli government claimed that the reporting had contributed to regional instability and the cancellation of a summit involving US President Joe Biden and leaders from Egypt and Palestine.


Palestinian filmmakers accuse Hollywood of ‘inhumanity and racism,’ urge colleagues to speak out

Palestinian filmmakers accuse Hollywood of ‘inhumanity and racism,’ urge colleagues to speak out
Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Palestinian filmmakers accuse Hollywood of ‘inhumanity and racism,’ urge colleagues to speak out

Palestinian filmmakers accuse Hollywood of ‘inhumanity and racism,’ urge colleagues to speak out
  • A group of almost 70 filmmakers signed the open letter criticizing ‘dehumanizing anti-Palestinian propaganda’
  • Appeal comes in wake of request to rescind Bisan Owda’s Emmy nomination for alleged ties to PFLP

LONDON: A group of nearly 70 Palestinian filmmakers has issued an open letter accusing Hollywood of “inhumanity and racism” and urging international film professionals to speak out against the portrayal of Palestinians in the Western entertainment industry.

Published in the US outlet Variety, the letter was signed by prominent figures including two-time Oscar nominee Hany Abu-Assad, director Elia Suleiman of “Divine Intervention” and “It Must Be Heaven,” and BAFTA-winning filmmaker Farah Nabulsi, known for her upcoming feature “The Teacher.”

The letter read: “We well understand the power of image and cinema, and for far too long we have been outraged at the inhumanity and racism shown by some in the western entertainment industry towards our people, even during this most difficult of times.”

The filmmakers emphasized the prevalence of what they describe as “anti-Palestinian and generally anti-Arab racist propaganda” in Western media, calling it “dehumanizing” and a direct threat to their existence as Palestinians.

They highlighted the critical historical moment for their community and called on their international colleagues to “do everything humanly possible to stop and end complicity with this unspeakable horror.”

The letter concluded: “This has to stop. Now.”

The filmmakers’ appeal comes in the wake of recent allegations against Bisan Owda, the director of the documentary “It’s Bisan from Gaza and I’m Still Alive.”

Owda has been accused by the Jewish non-profit organization Creative Community for Peace of having ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a US and EU-designated terrorist organization.

The organization had requested that Owda’s Emmy nomination be rescinded, but the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences, which organizes the Emmys, refused, stating that it was “unable to corroborate” the claims or find any evidence of Owda’s active involvement with the PFLP.

The letter thanked Natas for “standing up to pressure,” adding: “Trying to censor Bisan’s voice is only the latest repressive attempt to deny Palestinians the right to reclaim our narrative, share our history, and in this case bring attention to the atrocities our people are facing in the hopes that we can bring an end to them.”


Journalist dies in Gaza in Israeli airstrike

Journalist dies in Gaza in Israeli airstrike
Updated 29 August 2024
Follow

Journalist dies in Gaza in Israeli airstrike

Journalist dies in Gaza in Israeli airstrike
  • Mohamed Abd Rabbo was killed along with his sister Sumaya in an attack in Nuseirat camp

LONDON: Palestinian journalist Mohamed Abd Rabbo was killed in an Israeli airstrike on Wednesday in the Nuseirat camp, located in central Gaza.

His sister, Sumaya, was also killed in the attack.

Abd Rabbo, who worked for Al-Manara Media Co., is the latest victim in a growing list of Palestinian journalists killed since the start of the Israeli offensive on Gaza.

According to Gaza authorities, his death brings the total number of journalists killed during the conflict to 172, though the exact figure remains difficult to verify.

The Government Media Office in Gaza condemned Abd Rabbo’s death, describing the targeting of Palestinian journalists by Israeli forces as “systematic.”

The office called on the international community to intervene and put an end to what it has labeled as war crimes and genocide.


French prosecutors say Telegram messaging app CEO has been freed from custody, will appear in court

French prosecutors say Telegram messaging app CEO has been freed from custody, will appear in court
Updated 29 August 2024
Follow

French prosecutors say Telegram messaging app CEO has been freed from custody, will appear in court

French prosecutors say Telegram messaging app CEO has been freed from custody, will appear in court
  • Pavel Durov was detained on Saturday as part of a judicial inquiry opened last month involving 12 alleged criminal violations
  • Durov’s arrest in France has caused outrage in Russia, with some government officials calling it politically motivated

PARIS: French prosecutors on Wednesday freed Telegram CEO Pavel Durov from police custody after four days of questioning over allegations that the messaging app is being used for illegal activities.

Durov was detained on Saturday at Le Bourget airport outside Paris as part of a judicial inquiry opened last month involving 12 alleged criminal violations.

“An investigating judge has ended Pavel Durov’s police custody and will have him brought to court for a first appearance and a possible indictment,” a statement from the Paris prosecutor’s office said.

Allegations against the Russia-born Durov, who is a French citizen, include that his platform is being used for child sexual abuse material and drug trafficking, fraud and abetting organized crime transactions, and that Telegram refused to share information or documents with investigators when required by law.

Durov’s arrest in France has caused outrage in Russia, with some government officials calling it politically motivated and proof of the West’s double standard on freedom of speech. The outcry has raised eyebrows among Kremlin critics because in 2018, Russian authorities themselves tried to block the Telegram app but failed, withdrawing the ban in 2020.

In Iran, where Telegram is widely used despite being officially banned after years of protests challenging the country’s Shiite theocracy, Durov’s arrest in France prompted comments from the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei weighed in with veiled praise for France for being “strict” against those who “violate your governance” of the Internet.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Monday that Durov’s arrest wasn’t a political move but part of an independent investigation. Macron posted on X that his country “is deeply committed” to freedom of expression but “freedoms are upheld within a legal framework, both on social media and in real life, to protect citizens and respect their fundamental rights.”

In a statement posted on its platform after Durov’s arrest, Telegram said it abides by EU laws, and its moderation is “within industry standards and constantly improving.”

“It is absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform,” Telegram’s post said. “Almost a billion users globally use Telegram as means of communication and as a source of vital information. We’re awaiting a prompt resolution of this situation. Telegram is with you all.”

In addition to Russia and France, Durov is also a citizen of the United Arab Emirates and the Caribbean island nation of St. Kitts and Nevis.

The UAE Foreign Ministry said Tuesday that it was “closely following the case” and had asked France to provide Durov “with all the necessary consular services in an urgent manner.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he hoped that Durov “has all the necessary opportunities for his legal defense” and added that Moscow stands “ready to provide all necessary assistance and support” to the Telegram CEO as a Russian citizen.

“But the situation is complicated by the fact that he is also a citizen of France,” Peskov said.

Telegram, which says it has nearly a billion users worldwide, was founded by Durov and his brother after he himself faced pressure from Russian authorities.

In 2013, he sold his stake in VKontakte, a popular Russian social networking site which he launched in 2006.

The company came under pressure during the Russian government’s crackdown following mass pro-democracy protests that rocked Moscow at the end of 2011 and 2012.

Durov had said authorities demanded that the site take down online communities of Russian opposition activists, and later that it hand over personal data of users who took part in the 2013-2014 popular uprising in Ukraine, which eventually ousted a pro-Kremlin president.

Durov said in a recent interview that he had turned down these demands and left the country.

The demonstrations prompted Russian authorities to clamp down on the digital space, and Telegram and its pro-privacy rhetoric offered a convenient way for Russians to communicate and share news.

Telegram also continues to be a popular source of news in Ukraine, where both media outlets and officials use it to share information on the war, and deliver missile and air raid alerts.

Western governments have often criticized Telegram for a lack of content moderation, which experts say opens up the messaging app for potential use in money laundering, drug trafficking and the sharing of material linked to the sexual exploitation of minors.

In 2022, Germany issued fines of $5 million against Telegram’s operators for failing to establish a lawful way to reporting illegal content or to name an entity in Germany to receive official communication. Both are required under German laws that regulate large online platforms.


Brazil judge threatens to suspend X within 24 hours

Brazil judge threatens to suspend X within 24 hours
Updated 29 August 2024
Follow

Brazil judge threatens to suspend X within 24 hours

Brazil judge threatens to suspend X within 24 hours
  • Earlier this month, CEO Elon Musk shut down X’s business operations in Brazil
  • Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes accused of threatening the company’s previous legal representative

BRASILIA: A Brazilian Supreme Court judge threatened Wednesday to suspend X, formerly Twitter, if CEO Elon Musk doesn’t name a new legal representative for the social media site’s operations in the country.
Earlier this month Musk shut down X’s business operations in Brazil while preserving access to the social media site for users after accusing the judge of threatening the company’s previous legal representative.
In an order made public Wednesday, judge Alexandre de Moraes ordered Musk “to appoint the company’s new legal representative in Brazil within 24 hours.”
“In the event of non-compliance with the order, the decision provides for the suspension of the social network’s activities in Brazil.”
Moraes has spearheaded the battle against disinformation in South America’s largest nation, clashing with Musk along the way.
Musk and other critics have said Moraes is part of a sweeping crackdown on free speech.
Justifying the shutdown of the offices, Musk said that had X complied with de Moraes’s orders, “there was no way we could explain our actions without being ashamed.”
Moraes previously had ordered the suspension of several Twitter accounts suspected of spreading disinformation, including those of supporters of former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro, who tried to discredit the voting system in the 2022 presidential election, which he lost.
In April, X admitted that several users of blocked accounts had managed to circumvent the restrictions.
Musk is also the subject of a judicial investigation into an alleged scheme where public money was used to orchestrate disinformation campaigns in favor of Bolsonaro and those close to him.


Pro-Trump X accounts use stolen photos of European influencers: study

Pro-Trump X accounts use stolen photos of European influencers: study
Updated 29 August 2024
Follow

Pro-Trump X accounts use stolen photos of European influencers: study

Pro-Trump X accounts use stolen photos of European influencers: study

WASHINGTON: Meet “Eva,” “Sophia,” and “Samantha” — fake accounts which pose as chic American women who support Donald Trump on the platform X, disguising themselves by using stolen photographs of European fashion and beauty influencers, according to a study published Wednesday.
The report by the nonprofit Center for Information Resilience (CIR) comes as researchers express alarm ahead of the US election in November that the site owned by Elon Musk — who has endorsed Trump — is plagued with fake accounts and political disinformation.
CIR said it uncovered 16 accounts that used images of European influencers — without their permission — to pose as young women promoting Trump and encouraging thousands of followers to vote for the Republican nominee.
These accounts, which use stolen images of real people to appear authentic, were among 56 profiles that appear to be part of a coordinated campaign to push pro-Trump content, it added.
“By using images of the influencers, the accounts recognize the value of creating a believable human persona, steering clear of the generic photos and bot-like usernames usually associated with fake accounts,” CIR’s report said.
It was unclear who was behind the digital deception or whether the accounts were pushing pro-Trump content for ideological or monetary gain.
The fake profiles use everyday images from the influencers’ Instagram accounts — including pictures of them at the beach or walking their dog — which are captioned with MAGA-related hashtags or pledges to vote for Trump, CIR said.
MAGA, or Make America Great Again, is a political slogan associated with Trump and his campaign.
Many of the accounts have attempted to spread misinformation about hot-button political subjects such as a recent assassination attempt against Trump, his Democratic rival Kamala Harris’s ethnicity and US military aid to Ukraine, the report said.
Some accounts also promote anti-vaccine and Covid-19 conspiracies, with some posts viewed hundreds of thousands of times.
“They post about divisive issues in US politics in a bid to exploit pre-existing tensions,” the report said.
One of the impersonators is “Luna,” a self-described 32-year-old “MAGA Trump supporter,” who used images of a German fashion influencer named Debbie Nederlof, according to CNN, which jointly conducted the investigation with CIR.
Nederlof, a single mother, voiced anger and frustration over the misuse of her images, saying she had “nothing to do with the United States, with Trump, the political things over there.”
“What the hell do I — from a small place in Germany — care about US politics?” she said.
X did not respond to a request for comment.
Impersonation is a violation of the platform’s rules, and accounts posing as another person, group or organization may be “permanently suspended,” according to X’s website.
Musk appears to exert an outsized influence on US voters through the platform and his own personal account, which is regularly flagged by fact-checkers for spreading political falsehoods to his nearly 196 million followers.
Since Musk’s 2022 acquisition of X, the platform has gutted trust and safety teams and scaled back content moderation efforts once used to tame misinformation, making it what researchers call a haven for disinformation.